Important Notice

Dear customers,

We are thrilled to announce that starting from 17th Sept, the official website of the Chinese University of Hong Kong Press will be changed to cup.cuhk.edu.hk (Please click to enter). After the launch of our new site, the shopping cart function in the current website will be disabled and the order history of registered users will be kept until 31st October, 2019.

Please note that from Nov 1 onwards, the current website will be disabled.

Thank you for your support to the CUHK Press and we look forward to serving you with our new website.

215 x 140 mm, 109 pp
English, 1994/01
ISBN: 978-962-441-040-2
Price:US$4.50


* Option:

Out Of Stock
Quantity:

The Politics of Laissez-faire
Hong Kong's Strategy of Industrialization in Historical Perspective
Stephen Chiu
HKIAPS, Occasional Paper Series
Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, CUHK

In contrast to other late-industrializers, the colonial state of Hong Kong never pursued, nor even attempted, an interventionist development strategy during Hong Kong's postwar industrial take-off. In particular, it never interfered with the inter-sectoral flow of resources and did not provide special aid for the development of manufacturing industries. This paper argues that part of the cause of the (comparatively) more thorough adoption of a laissez-faire approach to industrialization can be found in the financial capacity of the state. Both the capitalist and the colonial nature of the Hong Kong state led to a low level of financial capacity. The other condition for laissez-faire in Hong Kong was the particular configuration of the governing coalition. When manufacturing industry was about to 'sprout' in the 1950s, the state's dominant coalition partner was the financial and commercial bourgeoisie while manufacturers occupied a marginal position in the power structure. The second part of this paper attempts to substantiate these contentions by taking a fresh look at two policy episodes surrounding the issues of industrial land and finance. It is argued that in both cases a combination of financial constraints over the state and the alliance between the colonial bureaucracy and the leading commercial and financial bourgeoisie worked to defeat both proposals for state allocation of industrial land at preferential terms (instead of by the market at the going rate through public auctions), and for the establishments of an industrial bank to supply long-term credit to manufacturers. These political defeats of the manufacturers laid the foundation of the laissez-faire strategy and steadfastly steered the state away from an interventionist industrial policy.

Write a Comment

Your Name:


Your Comment: Note: HTML is not translated!

Rating: Bad           Good

Enter the code in the box below:



PRIVACY POLICY | DISCLAIMER | Copyright © 2019. All Rights Reserved. The Chinese University Press.
Powered By OpenCart